Skip to content

Corporations and Health Watch

Tracking the effects of corporate practices on health

  • Subscribe
  • RESOURCES
    • Alcohol Industry
    • Automobile Industry
    • Firearms Industry
    • Food & Beverage Industry
    • Pharmaceutical Industry
    • Tobacco Industry
    • Other Resources
  • Contact
  • About Us
    • Founder
    • How to use this website
    • Our Publications
  • Books
    • At What Cost: Modern Capitalism and the Future of Health
    • Lethal But Legal

World Health Organization’s Global Action Plan (GAP)

Trade, health and globalization: Beyond the headlines

Posted on June 6, 2018 by Corporations and Health Watch

Screen Shot 2018-06-06 at 7.38.15 AM

Credit

As the United States revisits its trade policies with China, Canada, Mexico, the European Union nations, and other countries, it is easy to get lost in the complex national and global   business, political and social issues at play.  For public health researchers and scholars, the new debates on trade provide an opportunity to deepen public understanding of the health and social consequences of various trade regimes.

In a recent articlein Global Social Policy, Ashley Schram examines the impact of trade on non-communicable diseases:

Trade and investment policy has the capacity to support or undermine global action on rising noncommunicable disease (NCD) rates. This article will employ a political science approach to explore how ideology, institutions and interests within the trade and investment policy space may constrain policy recommendations made in the World Health Organization’s Global Action Plan (GAP) on NCDs. Specifically, it details how neoliberal ideology may constrain public health values, how the new constitutionalism may constrain public health legitimacy and how disparities in money, power and resources between elite economic actors and public policy actors may constrain the capacity of public health to influence trade and investment agreement negotiations. The implications of these constraints on the implementation of the GAP-NCDs are discussed.

The Schram article is contained in a special issueof Global Social Policyon trade and health for which some articlesare available open access.

For other perspectives on trade and health, visitthe link to the Livestream and resources presented at the CUNY Urban Food Policy Institute’s recent forum on Food, Trade, & Health: What Are the Connections?The speakers are: Alyshia Galvez, Associate Professor of Latin American Studies at Lehman College and the former director of the Jaime Lucero Institute of Mexican Studies at City University of New York. She is author of the forthcoming book, Eating NAFTA: Trade and Food Policies and the Destruction of Mexico and David Sanders,founder and Emeritus Professor of the School of Public Health at the University of the Western Cape in South Africa. He is also a founder of the People’s Health Movement, a global movement that promotes health justice. For decades, he has studied the health consequences of South Africa’s changing food system.

Posted in Food & BeverageTagged Global Social Policy, NAFTA, World Health Organization’s Global Action Plan (GAP)Leave a comment

Main Topics

  • At What Cost: Modern Capitalism and the Future of Health
  • Alcohol
  • Auto
  • Capitalism in the 21st Century
  • Firearms
  • Food & Beverage
  • Pharma
  • Tobacco

RSS

  • All
  • Alcohol
  • Auto
  • Firearms
  • Food & Beverage
  • Pharma
  • Tobacco

These RSS links require a feed reader application

Founder

  • Corporations and Health Watch's avatar Corporations and Health Watch

Archives

Follow Us

  • X
  • Facebook
Create a website or blog at WordPress.com
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Corporations and Health Watch
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Corporations and Health Watch
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...