A cascade of health crises—from the covid-19 pandemic to our climate emergency, and a rise in “deaths of despair”—are contributing to growing global health burdens, making this the time for health professionals to seek the common causes of these catastrophes. Despite the influence of dominant political and economic structures and health, health professionals are often reluctant to use the word capitalism when analyzing the world’s current health problems and proposing solutions. Is now the time for public health researchers, professionals , and activists to focus our attention on the role of 21st century capitalism in creating these crises, asks Nicholas Freudenberg in a BMJ First Opinion post? Read more.
Air pollution is a major environmental risk factor and contributor to chronic, noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). However most public health approaches to NCD prevention focus on behavioral and biomedical risk factors, rather than environmental risk factors such as air pollution. In this article, Eloise Howse et al. discuss the implications of such a focus. They urge those in public health and environmental science to work together to acknowledge the shared drivers, including corporate determinants of air pollution; take a ‘co-benefits’ approach to NCD prevention; and expand prevention research through systems thinking and intersectoral, cross-disciplinary collaboration. Read more.
In a study published in Globalization and Health designed to assess how food industry actors seek to influence the principles of scientific integrity, Mialon and colleagues present a case study of the International Life Science Institute (ILSI) as a key actor in that space. The authors conclude that the activities developed by ILSI on scientific integrity principles are part of a broader set of industry political practices of industry actors to influence public health policy, research, and practice. They argue that it is important to counter these practices as they risk shaping scientific standards to suit the industry’s interests rather than public health ones.
Corporate involvement in democratic processes typically takes the form of corporate political activity (CPA). In an article in Organizational Theory, Daniel Nyberg develops a framework of political corruption to explain the corroding influence of CPA on democratic processes. The articles explicates the corporate capture of democratic processes and assesses the role of corruption in Western liberal democracies. Finally, the author suggests ways to halt this process and thereby defend democracy as a system of governance from undue corporate interests.
“Science knows no country, because knowledge belongs to humanity, ” Louis Pasteur wrote in 1876. Today it would be more accurate to say that science belongs to the corporations and investors that have the money, power, and savvy to secure patents and bring new developments to global markets, a change that threatens human and planetary health. Nicholas Freudenberg writes in STAT that the pandemic and the cascade of other global public health crises, including the climate emergency, increasing deaths of despair, and the growing burdens of chronic diseases and mental health problems demand a new accounting of the costs of the corporate control of science and technology in the 21st century.
And an upcoming event…. Nicholas Freudenberg discusses Modern capitalism and the future of health: assessing the costs and charting alternatives, Tuesday April 20, 12:30- 1:30 pm , Australian Eastern Standard Time, Australia National University, register here
The United States finds itself in the middle of an unprecedented combination of crises: a global pandemic, economic crisis, and unprecedented civic responses to structural racism. While public sector responses to these crises have faced much justified criticism, the commercial determinants of these crises have not been sufficiently examined. In a commentary in The Milbank Quarterly, Maani et al. examine the nature of the contributions of such actors to the conditions that underpin these crises in the United States through their market and nonmarket activities. On the basis of their analysis, the authors make recommendations on the role of governance and civil society in relation to such commercial actors in a post-COVID-19 world.
Big Tech is finally getting the scrutiny it deserves. The Federal Trade Commission and 46 state attorneys general are suing Facebook for anti-competitive conduct; the Department of Justice has brought a case against Google, challenging its dominance in search engines; ten Republican attorneys general are suing Google over its ad technology practices. These are important efforts to rein in Big Tech’s economic advantages, but the global technology giants’ increasing harm to our health has not yet attracted the attention it warrants.Continue reading To protect health, rein in Big Tech: Influential companies must take responsibility for effects
Many Artificial Intelligence for Social Good (AI4SG) initiatives are shaped by the same corporate entities that incubate AI technologies, beyond democratic control, and stand to profit monetarily from their deployment. Such initiatives often pre-frame systemic social and environmental problems in tech-centric ways, while suggesting that addressing such problems hinges on more or better data. They thereby perpetuate incomplete, distorted models of social change that claim to be ‘data-driven’.Continue reading Beyond ‘AI for Social Good’ (AI4SG): social transformations—not tech-fixes—for health equity
In AT WHAT COST (Oxford University Press; on sale March 16, 2021; hardcover; $29.95), CUNY Distinguished Professor Nicholas Freudenberg examines how globalization, financial speculation, monopolies, and control of science and technology have enhanced the ability of corporations and their allies to overwhelm influences of government, family, community, and faith. It describes the ways that our current political and economic system has made it more difficult for ordinary people to get the food, health care, education, work, transportation, and social connections — what the book calls the six pillars of health — they need to maintain their health.
At What Cost argues that the world created by 21st-century capitalism is simply not fit to solve our most serious public health problems, from the covid pandemic and the climate emergency to opioid addiction and deaths of despair. Moreover, capitalism and systemic racism intersect to amplify the harms of each and widen stark inequities in health. However, author and public health expert Nicholas Freudenberg also argues that human and planetary well-being constitute a powerful mobilizing idea for a new social movement, one that will restore the power of individuals and communities in our democracy.
At What Cost is available from Oxford University Press as a hardcover or e-book and from other online and independent book sellers.
Watch the book launch where Freudenberg discusses his new book with Professors Marion Nestle and Mary Bassett and read this interview with Freudenberg in Salon. Visit the At What Cost section on this website here.
A new report in BMJ Global Health explores the links between unhealthy commodity industries (UCIs) such as tobacco, alcohol, unhealthy food, and gambling; analyzes the extent of alignment across their corporate political strategies, and proposes a cohesive systems approach to research across UCIs. The authors conclude that UCIs employ shared strategies to shape public health policy, protecting business interests, and thereby contributing to the perpetuation of non-communicable diseases. A cohesive systems approach to research across UCIs is required to deepen shared understanding of this complex and interconnected area and to inform a more effective and coherent response.Continue reading Developing a cohesive systems approach to research across unhealthy commodity industries